top of page

DISABILITY DISCOURSE
MATTERS

The language political leaders use shapes the society we live in. How people with disabilities are talked about can influence policy, public perception, and daily life. Words carry weight—they inform understanding, set priorities, and affect how individuals are treated. Thoughtful language can lead to better policy, while careless rhetoric may fuel harmful perceptions and misguided policy decisions. Disability Discourse Matters collects statements by political leaders about disability, creating a dataset that captures how disability is discussed in the public sphere. Over time, this data will support deeper analysis of how shifts in language relate to changes in law, policy, and public attitudes.

Disability Discourse matters logo  (1).png

DISABILITY DISCOURSE IN

AMERICA

*Data reflects the White House and Cabinet from 1/1/2025  - 10/29/2025
 

Scoring System

DEHUMANIZES

VALUES THE WHOLE PERSON​

1

Uses hate/ableist speech and/or encourages violence toward individuals with disabilities

2

Critical of the social, cognitive, physical, and/or employment abilities of individuals with disabilities

3

Uses a deficit frame regarding the social, cognitive, physical, and/or employment abilities of individuals with disabilities 

4

Values the social, cognitive, physical, and/or employment abilities of individuals with disabilities 

Discourse Dashboards.

What Is Disability Discourse Matters?

History has shown that the language used by politicians and policymakers profoundly shapes the policies, practices, and daily experiences of individuals with disabilities. The goal of this project is to track shifts in disability-related discourse over time and examine how this rhetoric influences policy decisions across the country.

Powered by strategic AI, Disability Discourse Matters (DDM) collects and analyzes statements about people with disabilities made by political leaders, while also tracking related policy proposals over time. The dataset currently focuses on two interactive dashboards—the White House (including the President, Vice President, cabinet members, advisors, and heads of executive departments and independent agencies) and members of the U.S. Senate.

Over time, DDM will expand to include all 535 voting members of Congress (100 senators and 435 representatives), as well as statements and rulings from the nine Supreme Court justices and governors across all 50 states. To capture discourse at the local level, the system will also gather statements from political leaders such as school board members and state legislators across all 3,144 counties and county-equivalents in the United States, including the District of Columbia.

Each collected statement is evaluated using a four-point scale that measures whether it dehumanizes or affirms the worth of individuals with disabilities. These results are then visualized on this website, allowing the public to explore how disability discourse evolves across time and levels of government.

Image by Kyle Mills

Why Does Discourse Matter in America?

Language, whether intentional or not, is a powerful tool that can shape people's lives. The words politicians and political leaders use shape the society we live in. The way they speak about individuals with disabilities directly influences policies, practices, and the everyday experiences of people with disabilities. Outdated, harmful, and ableist language reinforces negative stereotypes, fuels discrimination and marginalization, and limits opportunities for individuals with disabilities to fully participate in society. Impact on Policy and Funding When policymakers focus on what people with disabilities are perceived to lack rather than their strengths, they risk shaping policies based on assumptions of incapability. This deficit-based perspective can lead to segregation, excessive control, or the perception that people with disabilities are passive recipients of charity rather than active and valuable members of society. Deficit framing also affects funding decisions. When individuals with disabilities are seen as dependent or incapable of contributing to society, financial support may be allocated to welfare programs without necessary investments in infrastructure—such as accessible transportation, education, and workplaces—that enable independent living and full participation in society. Impact on Education Every learner is different. When people with disabilities are viewed through a deficit lens, educational policies often prioritize segregation rather than fostering inclusive learning environments that support all students. This approach reduces access to quality education for both students with and without disabilities, limiting academic opportunities and preventing students with disabilities from reaching their full potential. Impact on Employment The way disabilities are discussed influences societal attitudes and workplace inclusion. When disability discourse fails to recognize the value of people with disabilities, it can lead to exclusionary hiring practices and inadequate workplace accommodations. This, in turn, limits job opportunities, economic participation, and financial independence for individuals with disabilities. Impact on Accessibility A deficit-focused narrative overlooks the political, social, economic, and environmental barriers that restrict accessibility. When we recognize the strengths, skills, and potential of individuals with disabilities, we foster more inclusive discourse. This shift helps society acknowledge that many barriers people with disabilities face are created by the environment—not by disability itself—and that policies should aim to remove these barriers.

JOIN THE DISCOURSE!
Get the Latest News & Updates

YSM-Disability Discourse Matters_edited.
  • image
  • LinkedIn

This study was approved by the Yale University Institutional Review Board (IRES 2000039786) and was pre-registered on Open Science Framework. 

Read the pre-registration here

YSM Wordmark.jpg

© DisabilityDiscourseMatters.org

bottom of page