DISABILITY DISCOURSE
MATTERS
The language political leaders use shapes the society we live in. How people with disabilities are talked about can influence policy, public perception, and daily life. Words carry weight - they inform understanding, set priorities, and affect how individuals are treated. Thoughtful language can lead to better policy, while careless rhetoric may fuel harmful perceptions and misguided policy decisions. Disability Discourse Matters collects statements by political leaders about disability, creating a dataset that captures how disability is discussed in the public sphere. Over time, this data will support deeper analysis of how shifts in language relate to changes in law, policy, and public attitudes.
SCORING SYSTEM.
DEHUMANIZES
VALUES THE WHOLE PERSON
1
Uses dehumanizing language and/or encourages violence toward individuals with disabilities
2
Critical of the social, cognitive, physical, and/or employment abilities of individuals with disabilities
3
Uses a deficit frame regarding the social, cognitive, physical, and/or employment abilities of individuals with disabilities
4
Values the social, cognitive, physical, and/or employment abilities of individuals with disabilities
DISCOURSE DASHBOARDS.
What Is Disability Discourse Matters?
The language used by politicians and policymakers shapes public policy, institutional practices, and the everyday experiences of people with disabilities. Disability Discourse Matters (DDM) tracks how disability-related discourse changes over time and examines how that rhetoric connects to policy decisions across the country.
What DDM tracks
Powered by strategic AI, DDM collects and analyzes statements about people with disabilities made by political leaders while also tracking related policy proposals. The project currently focuses on two interactive dashboards covering the White House, including the President, Vice President, cabinet members, advisors, and heads of executive departments and independent agencies and members of the U.S. Senate.
Who will be included
DDM will expand to include all 535 voting members of Congress, the nine Supreme Court justices, governors across all 50 states, and political leaders at the local level. This includes school board members and state legislators across all 3,144 U.S. counties and county-equivalents, including the District of Columbia.
How statements are evaluated
Each collected statement is evaluated using a four-point scale that measures whether the language dehumanizes or affirms the worth of people with disabilities. The results are visualized throughout the site so users can explore how disability discourse changes across time, political institutions, and levels of government.
THE FACTS.

Why Does Discourse Matter in America?
Language, whether intentional or not, is a powerful tool that can shape people's lives. The words politicians and political leaders use shape the society we live in. The way they speak about individuals with disabilities directly influences policies, practices, and the everyday experiences of people with disabilities. Outdated, harmful, and ableist language reinforces negative stereotypes, fuels discrimination and marginalization, and limits opportunities for individuals with disabilities to fully participate in society. Impact on Policy and Funding When policymakers focus on what people with disabilities are perceived to lack rather than their strengths, they risk shaping policies based on assumptions of incapability. This deficit-based perspective can lead to segregation, excessive control, or the perception that people with disabilities are passive recipients of charity rather than active and valuable members of society. Deficit framing also affects funding decisions. When individuals with disabilities are seen as dependent or incapable of contributing to society, financial support may be allocated to welfare programs without necessary investments in infrastructure—such as accessible transportation, education, and workplaces—that enable independent living and full participation in society. Impact on Education Every learner is different. When people with disabilities are viewed through a deficit lens, educational policies often prioritize segregation rather than fostering inclusive learning environments that support all students. This approach reduces access to quality education for both students with and without disabilities, limiting academic opportunities and preventing students with disabilities from reaching their full potential. Impact on Employment The way disabilities are discussed influences societal attitudes and workplace inclusion. When disability discourse fails to recognize the value of people with disabilities, it can lead to exclusionary hiring practices and inadequate workplace accommodations. This, in turn, limits job opportunities, economic participation, and financial independence for individuals with disabilities. Impact on Accessibility A deficit-focused narrative overlooks the political, social, economic, and environmental barriers that restrict accessibility. When we recognize the strengths, skills, and potential of individuals with disabilities, we foster more inclusive discourse. This shift helps society acknowledge that many barriers people with disabilities face are created by the environment—not by disability itself—and that policies should aim to remove these barriers.







